Publication

Mechanisms of weight loss-induced remission in people with prediabetes: a post-hoc analysis of the randomised, controlled, multicentre Prediabetes Lifestyle Intervention Study (PLIS).

Journal : The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology
Authors : Sandforth A, von Schwartzenberg RJ, Arreola EV, Hanson RL, Sancar G, Katzenstein S, Lange K, Prei脽l H, Dreher SI, Weigert C, Wagner R, Kantartzis K, Machann J, Schick F, Lehmann R, Peter A, Katsouli N, Ntziachristos V, Dannecker C, Fritsche L, Perakakis N, Heni M, Nawroth PP, Kopf S, Pfeiffer AFH, Kabisch S, Stumvoll M, Schwarz PEH, Hauner H, Lechner A, Seissler J, Yurchenko I, Icks A, Solimena M, H盲ring HU, Szendroedi J, Sch眉rmann A, de Angelis MH, Bl眉her M, Roden M, Bornstein SR, Stefan N, Fritsche A, Birkenfeld AL
10.1016/S2213-8587(23)00235-8 : DOI
37769677 : PMID

Background

Remission of type 2 diabetes can occur as a result of weight loss and is characterised by liver fat and pancreas fat reduction and recovered insulin secretion. In this analysis, we aimed to investigate the mechanisms of weight loss- induced remission in people with prediabetes.

Methods

In this prespecified post-hoc analysis, weight loss-induced resolution of prediabetes in the randomised, controlled, multicentre Prediabetes Lifestyle Intervention Study (PLIS) was assessed, and the results were validated against participants from the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) study. For PLIS, between March 1, 2012, and Aug 31, 2016, participants were recruited from eight clinical study centres (including seven university hospitals) in Germany and randomly assigned to receive either a control intervention, a standard lifestyle intervention (ie, DPP-based intervention), or an intensified lifestyle intervention for 12 months. For DPP, participants were recruited from 23 clinical study centres in the USA between July 31, 1996, and May 18, 1999, and randomly assigned to receive either a standard lifestyle intervention, metformin, or placebo. In both PLIS and DPP, only participants who were randomly assigned to receive lifestyle intervention or placebo and who lost at least 5% of their bodyweight were included in this analysis. Responders were defined as people who returned to normal fasting plasma glucose (FPG; <5路6 mmol/L), normal glucose tolerance (<7路8 mmol/L), and HbA less than 39 mmol/mol after 12 months of lifestyle intervention or placebo or control intervention. Non-responders were defined as people who had FPG, 2 h glucose, or HbA more than these thresholds. The main outcomes for this analysis were insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion, visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and intrahepatic lipid content (IHL) and were evaluated via linear mixed models.

Findings

Of 1160 participants recruited to PLIS, 298 (25路7%) had weight loss of 5% or more of their bodyweight at baseline. 128 (43%) of 298 participants were responders and 170 (57%) were non-responders. Responders were younger than non-responders (mean age 55路6 years [SD 9路9] vs 60路4 years [8路6]; p<0路0001). The DPP validation cohort included 683 participants who lost at least 5% of their bodyweight at baseline. Of these, 132 (19%) were responders and 551 (81%) were non-responders. In PLIS, BMI reduction was similar between responders and non-responders (responders mean at baseline 32路4 kg/m [SD 5路6] to mean at 12 months 29路0 kg/m [4路9] vs non-responders 32路1 kg/m [5路9] to 29路2 kg/m [5路4]; p=0路86). However, whole-body insulin sensitivity increased more in responders than in non-responders (mean at baseline 291 mL/[min 脳 m], SD 60 to mean at 12 months 378 mL/[min 脳 m], 56 vs 278 mL/[min 脳 m], 62, to 323 mL/[min 脳 m], 66; p<0路0001), whereas insulin secretion did not differ within groups over time or between groups (responders mean at baseline 175 pmol/mmol [SD 64] to mean at 12 months 163路7 pmol/mmol [60路6] vs non-responders 158路0 pmol/mmol [55路6] to 154路1 pmol/mmol [56路2]; p=0路46). IHL decreased in both groups, without a difference between groups (responders mean at baseline 10路1% [SD 8路7] to mean at 12 months 3路5% [3路9] vs non-responders 10路3% [8路1] to 4路2% [4路2]; p=0路34); however, VAT decreased more in responders than in non-responders (mean at baseline 6路2 L [SD 2路9] to mean at 12 months 4路1 L [2路3] vs 5路7 L [2路3] to 4路5 L [2路2]; p=0路0003). Responders had a 73% lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes than non-responders in the 2 years after the intervention ended.

Interpretation

By contrast to remission of type 2 diabetes, resolution of prediabetes was characterised by an improvement in insulin sensitivity and reduced VAT. Because return to normal glucose regulation (NGR) prevents development of type 2 diabetes, we propose the concept of remission of prediabetes in analogy to type 2 diabetes. We suggest that remission of prediabetes should be the primary therapeutic aim in individuals with prediabetes.

Funding

German Federal Ministry for Education and Research via the German Center for Diabetes Research; the Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts Baden-W眉rttemberg; the Helmholtz Association and Helmholtz Munich; the Cluster of Excellence Controlling Microbes to Fight Infections; and the German Research Foundation.